Track whether coal subsidies continue in future budget proposals and whether they crowd out renewable energy investments that could better serve affected communities.
This is analysis/criticism of existing policy allocation, not a new governance action. The $700M funding appears to be previously allocated, making this retrospective commentary rather than a constitutional event. Scores very low on A (minor corruption concern for resource misallocation) but also low on B as it lacks viral elements. Qualifies as noise: policy criticism without new institutional lever or mechanism.