Monitor the appellate court's ruling on tariff refund eligibility, as the substantive policy outcome affects import costs and economic impact, but the appeal process itself is procedurally normal.
This is routine appellate procedure following an adverse court ruling on tariff policy. While it involves separation of powers (executive challenging judicial constraint), the appeal itself is a normal legal mechanism with temporary effect and high reversibility. The constitutional stakes are low—this is standard adversarial litigation, not defiance or institutional capture. Both A and B scores are below salience thresholds, and the event lacks institutional leverage beyond normal court process.