SAVE Act represents genuine election administration change with federal scope and documented mechanism (election_admin_change). A-score: Election integrity driver scores 3.5 (voting requirements modification affecting access), civil_rights 3.0 (potential differential impact on voter access), rule_of_law 2.0 (legislative process norms), separation 1.5 (federal-state election authority tension). Severity: durability 1.1 (legislative changes persist), reversibility 0.95 (can be repealed but creates precedent), precedent 1.05 (voting requirements framework). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for documented election_admin_change, scope 1.2 for federal level. Base 16.83 * 1.10 = 23.96. B-score: Layer 1 shows high outrage_bait 7.5 (voter suppression framing), media_friendliness 7.0 (partisan conflict narrative), moderate meme_ability 4.0, low novelty 3.0 (recurring voting rights debate). Layer 2: pattern_match 7.0 (fits established partisan voting narratives), mismatch 6.0 (framed as suppression vs security), timing 5.5 (election cycle relevance), narrative_pivot 5.0. Intentionality 8/15 for partisan framing and timing. Final B 22.73. Delta +1.23 falls within Mixed threshold (both scores near 25, |D|<10). This represents substantive policy debate with genuine constitutional implications but also significant partisan hype amplification.