This event scores extremely low on constitutional damage (0.65) but very high on distraction/hype (38.72), yielding D=-38.07. The claim of 'unprecedented executive overreach' is a political statement without specific mechanisms, actions, or measurable constitutional harm documented. The norm_erosion_only mechanism receives 0.3 modifier as it represents the weakest form of constitutional concern. Rule_of_law scores 1 (minimal concern about process), separation scores 2 (rhetorical challenge to executive power) but without concrete examples of actual overreach, institutional breakdown, or irreversible damage. Layer 1 hype is extremely high: outrage_bait (8) for 'unprecedented in history' framing, media_friendliness (9) for partisan conflict narrative, novelty (7) for superlative claim. Layer 2 shows strong strategic indicators: mismatch (9) between dramatic claim and absence of specific constitutional violations, timing (7) for political positioning, narrative_pivot (8) for reframing executive actions as constitutional crisis. Intentionality markers include political figure amplification, superlative language without evidence, vague specifics, and clear partisan positioning (11/15). This is a textbook List B event: high-volume political rhetoric masquerading as constitutional alarm without substantive legal mechanisms or documented harm.