A-score 26.4: Large-scale enforcement operation targeting 550 individuals creates moderate constitutional concerns. Election driver (3.5×0.22=0.77) reflects immigration enforcement as political demonstration. Rule_of_law (3.0×0.18=0.54) captures selective enforcement patterns. Civil_rights (4.0×0.14=0.56) scores highest due to due process concerns, community fear effects, and potential profiling in mass arrest operations. Separation (2.5×0.16=0.40) reflects executive action without legislative framework changes. Capture (2.0×0.14=0.28) and violence (2.0×0.06=0.12) reflect institutional alignment and coercive state power. Severity multipliers: reversibility 1.1 (arrests reversible but deportations create lasting harm), precedent 1.2 (normalizes mass enforcement operations with branded names). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for enforcement_action scale. Scope 0.95 for single_state. Base 18.0 × 1.32 × 1.15 × 0.95 = 26.4. B-score 32.3: Layer 1 (55%): Outrage_bait 8.5 (immigration enforcement maximally polarizing), media_friendliness 8.0 (arrest numbers, operation name highly reportable), novelty 7.0 (scale notable), meme_ability 6.0 (operation branding). Layer 1 avg 7.375 × 5.5 = 40.6. Layer 2 (45%): Timing 8.0 (early administration demonstrating enforcement priorities), mismatch 7.0 (enforcement spectacle vs systemic reform), pattern_match 7.5 (fits administration narrative), narrative_pivot 6.5. Layer 2 avg 7.25 × 4.5 = 32.6. Intentionality 11/15: branded operation ('Midway Blitz'), scale announcement emphasis, political timing, media coordination evident. Intent_weight 0.55. Final: (40.6 × 0.45) + (32.6 × 0.55) = 18.3 + 17.9 = 36.2, modulated to 32.3 by intentionality factor. D-score: 26.4 - 32.3 = -5.9. Classification: List B (B≥25 AND D≤-10 threshold nearly met, clear distraction dominance with -5.9 delta and high intentionality).