This event scores low on constitutional damage (6.5) as it involves concerns about potential budget cuts to an international aid program. Separation scores 1 (executive discretion over budget priorities), civil_rights 2 (health access implications for vulnerable populations internationally), capture 1 (potential influence over humanitarian program). The mechanism is resource_reallocation with international scope, yielding modest modifiers. B-score is 18.4 driven by moderate outrage potential and pattern-matching to 'Trump cuts humanitarian programs' narrative. Critical noise indicators: this is entirely anticipatory - former officials expressing fears about what might happen, with no concrete policy changes announced. Two identical article titles suggest limited actual reporting. No mechanism has been activated yet, only concerns voiced. This is classic preemptive outrage generation.