Monitor court filings to identify: (1) specific exclusion criteria used, (2) whether excluded individuals were Trump critics/opponents, and (3) any discovery revealing intent behind fund design.
This scores as List A (51-24=+27 margin) due to substantial corruption and civil rights concerns around selective fund exclusions targeting specific individuals. The lawsuit itself is the accountability mechanism challenging potential self-dealing or retaliatory resource allocation. Limited information prevents higher confidence, but the pattern of excluding those 'specifically targeted' suggests weaponized distribution of public funds.