This event scores high on both scales (A=31.8, B=33.5, D=-1.7), qualifying as Mixed. Constitutional damage is substantial: rule_of_law (4.5) reflects federal prosecution of state judiciary for alleged obstruction, creating chilling effects on judicial independence; separation (4.0) captures executive branch criminalizing judicial actions that may have been within discretionary authority; civil_rights (2.5) for potential sanctuary/due process implications; corruption (3.5) for abuse-of-authority allegations. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 1.3x multiplier as it creates precedent for federal intervention against state judiciary. Single_state scope reduces to 0.85x. Severity multipliers: durability 1.1 (precedent for future prosecutions), precedent 1.2 (novel federal-state judicial conflict). Distraction score is higher: Layer 1 (16.5/30): outrage_bait 8.5 (judge helping 'illegal'), novelty 7.5 (rare judicial arrest), media_friendliness 8.0 (clear villain narrative). Layer 2 (13.95/25.5): timing 8.5 (aligns with immigration enforcement surge), pattern_match 8.0 (fits obstruction narrative), mismatch 7.0 (judicial independence vs law-and-order). Intentionality 11/15 suggests strategic timing with broader immigration crackdown, high-profile target amplifies deterrent message. The -1.7 delta places this in Mixed territory, but closer to B given the strategic deployment during heightened immigration enforcement period.