A-score 31.76: Regulatory rollback eliminating transparency requirements represents moderate constitutional damage. Rule_of_law (3.5×0.18=0.63): Weakens administrative accountability framework and environmental enforcement mechanisms. Capture (4×0.14=0.56): Clear regulatory capture pattern - EPA serving polluter interests over public environmental protection mandate. Civil_rights (2.5×0.14=0.35): Environmental justice implications as reduced reporting disproportionately affects vulnerable communities near pollution sources. Separation (2×0.16=0.32): Executive agency undermining congressional intent behind environmental monitoring statutes. Corruption (2×0.10=0.20): Opacity benefits regulated entities at public expense. Severity multipliers: durability 1.15 (10-year delay creates entrenched opacity), reversibility 1.1 (requires future rulemaking), precedent 1.05 (normalizes reduced environmental accountability). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for policy_change with broad federal scope modifier 1.2. B-score 14.35: Moderate hype from environmental advocacy amplification. Layer1 (4.95): outrage_bait 3 (climate activists mobilize), media_friendliness 3 (clear environmental angle), novelty 2 (deregulation pattern), meme_ability 1 (technical policy). Layer2 (4.4): pattern_match 3 (fits anti-regulation narrative), mismatch 2 (transparency vs opacity framing), narrative_pivot 2 (climate debate), timing 1. Intentionality 6 (delayed implementation tactic, reduces corporate oversight). Delta +17.41 clearly exceeds +10 threshold with A>=25.