Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
The Trump administration reversed Biden-era gun safety regulations by allowing forced reset triggers, which enable rapid-fire capability. This represents a rollback of firearm safety regulations.
This policy reversal scores A=13.62 (below 25 threshold) and B=21.64 (below 25 threshold). While forced reset triggers enable rapid-fire capability raising violence concerns (3), the constitutional damage is limited: rule_of_law (2) reflects regulatory flip-flopping but within executive authority; separation (1) shows normal administrative process; civil_rights (1) touches Second Amendment but no direct rights violation; capture (2) suggests gun lobby influence. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for policy_change with federal scope 1.2. Severity: durability 1.1 (can be re-reversed), reversibility 0.9 (easily undone), precedent 1.0 (regulatory changes common). B-score elevated by outrage_bait (7) on gun safety, media_friendliness (8) for polarizing topic, pattern_match (6) fits Trump deregulation narrative. Intentionality moderate (6) as partisan wedge issue with early-admin timing. However, this is standard regulatory reversal within executive discretion, lacks clear constitutional mechanism damage, and falls below both thresholds.
Monitor for: (1) actual deployment/use of forced reset triggers in incidents, (2) legal challenges claiming administrative overreach, (3) state-level responses creating regulatory patchwork, (4) whether this signals broader ATF regulatory rollback pattern affecting enforcement capacity.