This is a statement by an agency head encouraging a demographic group to use existing legal protections - not a policy change, rule modification, or enforcement action. The mechanism is 'norm_erosion_only' with no structural damage. Civil_rights driver scores 1 (minimal) as this represents rhetorical framing around existing anti-discrimination law, not actual rights restriction. Severity multipliers at 0.8 reflect the statement's transience and easy reversibility. Mechanism modifier 0.3 applied because norm erosion without institutional change has limited constitutional impact. A-score: 0.19. B-score is high: outrage_bait (4) - deliberately provocative identity politics framing; meme_ability (3) - quotable and shareable; novelty (3) - unusual agency head statement; media_friendliness (4) - generates clicks across political spectrum. Layer 2: mismatch (4) - statement framed as major shift when it's just encouraging use of existing law; narrative_pivot (4) - reframes civil rights enforcement through identity lens; pattern_match (3) - fits DEI backlash narrative cycle. Intentionality indicators present (narrative wedge, outrage optimization, identity politics). B-score: 43.73. Delta: -43.54. Clear List B classification.