Federal judicial orders requiring return of mistakenly deported individuals represent significant constitutional damage. Rule_of_law (4.5): systemic deportation errors indicate breakdown in due process procedures, though judicial correction mechanism functioning. Separation (3.5): judiciary checking executive deportation authority, enforcing constitutional protections against executive overreach. Civil_rights (4): fundamental liberty interests violated through erroneous deportation, though correctable. Corruption (2): systemic errors suggest administrative dysfunction rather than intentional malfeasance. Mechanism_modifier 1.15 for judicial remediation of executive action. Severity: reversibility 1.1 as individuals can be returned but harm already inflicted; durability 0.9 as case-specific rather than permanent systemic change. B-score modest: some outrage potential around government errors, limited meme-ability, moderate media coverage of individual cases. Layer2 minimal as straightforward judicial oversight story without strategic manipulation indicators. D-score +25.25 clearly indicates List A: substantive constitutional issue with judicial branch enforcing due process against executive errors.