This event represents a potential funding cut to a CDC surveillance program - a routine budget/resource allocation decision without constitutional implications. A-score is minimal (0.9): only marginal capture driver (1/5) as it involves public health infrastructure capacity, but no actual constitutional damage mechanism is present. The 'resource_reallocation' mechanism receives 0.6 modifier as it's standard budgetary process. B-score is low-moderate (11.3): some media appeal around public health monitoring and disease surveillance, modest timing relevance in post-pandemic context, but limited viral potential. Critical noise indicators: (1) 'potential' cut not actual policy change, (2) routine appropriations process, (3) single program scope without broader constitutional implications, (4) no mechanism for lasting institutional damage. This is standard budget politics around a specific program, not constitutional erosion.