This event scores 24.51 on constitutional damage (A) and 32.48 on distraction/hype (B), yielding D=-7.97, classifying as List B. A-score: Significant civil_rights impact (4.5) for viewpoint-based visa discrimination and First Amendment chilling effects on speech moderation. Strong rule_of_law concerns (4.0) for arbitrary administrative action targeting specific employment history. Election integrity impact (3.5) through intimidation of content moderation infrastructure. Capture concerns (3.0) as policy serves tech sector pressure campaign. Norm erosion mechanism reduces modifier to 0.85; narrow population and federal scope yield 0.90 scope modifier. Severity: precedent multiplier 1.15 for novel employment-based visa restriction, durability 1.1 for policy entrenchment, reversibility 0.95 for administrative flexibility. B-score: Extremely high outrage_bait (8.5) targeting tech censorship narrative. Strong media_friendliness (8.0) for culture war framing. High novelty (7.5) for unprecedented visa criterion. Layer 2: narrative_pivot (8.0) from immigration to tech censorship, pattern_match (7.5) with anti-woke agenda, mismatch (7.0) between narrow impact and broad implications. Intentionality 11/15 for clear retribution pattern against perceived political opponents, chilling effect on speech infrastructure, ideological targeting of content moderators. B exceeds 25 and D<-10, confirming List B classification.