This event scores 18.5 on constitutional damage (below 25 threshold) and 23.4 on distraction/hype. Election driver (3.5) reflects immigration as campaign issue but not direct electoral interference. Rule_of_law (3.0) captures executive pressure on judiciary but within normal advocacy bounds. Separation (2.5) shows executive-judicial interaction but through standard legal channels. Civil_rights (4.0) highest driver as protective status removal directly impacts vulnerable migrant population rights. Policy_change mechanism adds 15% modifier as this uses administrative/legal channels. Severity: durability 1.1 (policy changes can persist), reversibility 0.95 (future admin can restore), precedent 1.05 (modest implications for executive immigration authority). B-score elevated by outrage_bait (7.5) targeting vulnerable population, media_friendliness (7.0) for immigration controversy, and pattern_match (7.0) fitting Trump immigration narrative. Intentionality moderate (8) as immigration enforcement is stated policy priority. Delta: -4.9 (B>A). Neither score reaches 25 threshold, placing this as standard policy action with predictable political controversy rather than constitutional crisis or pure distraction.