A-score 31.5: FEMA resource reallocation to detention infrastructure creates moderate constitutional concerns. Civil_rights (4.0) reflects expansion of detention capacity affecting vulnerable populations and due process concerns. Election (3.5) captures immigration policy weaponization in electoral context. Rule_of_law (3.0) reflects administrative state power to redirect emergency management resources toward immigration enforcement. Separation (2.5) shows executive branch expanding detention without clear legislative mandate for FEMA involvement. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for resource_reallocation redirecting disaster relief agency. Federal scope 1.3x. Severity: durability 1.2 (infrastructure takes years to build/dismantle), reversibility 1.1 (funding commitments hard to unwind), precedent 1.15 (normalizes FEMA as immigration enforcement tool). B-score 27.1: High outrage potential (7.5) around detention centers and migrant treatment. Strong narrative_pivot (7.0) connecting emergency management to immigration enforcement. Media_friendliness (7.0) - visual, emotional, partisan angles. Mismatch (6.0) between FEMA's disaster relief mission and detention infrastructure. Intentionality 8/15 for deliberate policy rollout. D-score +4.4 places this in Mixed territory - both substantial constitutional impact AND significant hype/distraction potential, neither clearly dominant.