Multiple state attorneys general and civil rights groups filed legal challenges to Trump's executive order eliminating birthright citizenship. The Society for the Rule of Law filed an amicus brief, and Attorney General Jay Jones joined a multistate coalition opposing the order.
Track the court rulings on these challenges - judicial outcomes will determine whether the executive order stands, making the actual birthright citizenship order the event to monitor for constitutional damage.
This event scores A=0 because it represents DEFENSIVE legal action against executive overreach, not the overreach itself. The actual Trump executive order eliminating birthright citizenship (which appears as a separate event this week) would score high on A. Legal challenges by AGs and civil rights groups are the constitutional immune system responding appropriately through judicial channels - this is how separation of powers is supposed to work. The B score is low because legal filings generate minimal hype despite constitutional importance.